Sectarian Portrait

I fail to understand why are people trying to portray every untoward incident in Pakistan and for that matter in troubled Pakhtunkhwa (former NWFP) to their "sectarian backdrop" for instance shia-sunni, deobandi-wahabi, pashtun-punjabi taliban conflict. The cynicism is touching the lowest ebb and about every triviality is published and broadcasted with religious enthusiasm. The media and intelligentsia too shares the blame. After all they tend to justify the unjustified claim of the biased west that all Muslims are "intolerant". Our internal pseudo-philosophers should understand this serves none, not even America. The Americans have been endeavoured diplomatically with great pain to be convinced (as options too are very scarce save diplomatic) that their drone attacks are counterproductive. Even the Britains and Germans are cognizant of this fact. It is, however, felt that America seeks its interest in dividing the muslim world. This fact is very much evident in its biased policy towards middle East, where it banishes Iran for pursuing peaceful nuclear energy, but never suspects the aspirations of Israel for that matter. Their criminal silence and ignorance on the Gaza carnage is not for the time a testimony to their share in the venture. Moreover, it has been fuelling fueds between Iran and the Gulf Sheikhdoms. It is comprehensible that why it promotes the case of Sheikhs' right to Civil Nuclear Power so graciously. Thus the assertion is not unfounded that the world is not going to find peace even for a moment onwards, unless a decisive war like the one WWII, that settled the ground for new world order. The new world is propagated religiously by America and the zions, but sugarcoated with the assumption that the fruits of such a mass reshuffle shall be favouable to the supremacy of America and its cronies.